Think. Don’t emote.
It seems a small and logical thing but during the heat of a moment, men tend to be fighters. If they feel burdened and treated unfairly the “thinking” can go out of the window. Subsequently, men and women merely want to strike out at what is oppressing them! If it’s legit, can you really blame them?
Yet, It is not always the wisest choice, especially if the odds are overwhelming. As Pastor Joe says, more than any other country Americans sincerely want to fight for what is right. They sit in, picket, and join together for what they sincerely believe in, not what they are told they should believe in.
However, if gone too far – if violence ensues – an unfortunate thing called martial law can be declared — on everyone.
No one wants it but if it happens there are three effective ways to deal with martial law. After the break check out the video on the next page and hear a very wise man advise you on your options!
Next Page »
nice face shields..my rounds go right through that$#%&!@*.and your body armor
That’s all for stones, glass bottes, and basic weapons
That’s all for stones, glass bottes, and basic weapons
That’s all for stones, glass bottes, and basic weapons
That’s all for stones, glass bottes, and basic weapons
Okay so here’s a little tidbit;
People in the military don’t want to kill US citizens, we joined up to defend the nation and that loosely correlates to protecting the people. We aren’t going to round people up and cull them. We aren’t going to bust into your house and do whatever we want, we’re going to act on orders that make it safer to do our job, and further with the intention to make everyone safer. Our oath is to protect from threats foreign and domestic and to defend the constitution. If your make yourself to be a domestic threat, you’ll be dealt with. If you start infringing on the liberties set by the constitution, your probably going to be detained. The best thing you can do is to ride it out and try not to swim up the current. If you can’t do that, then yeah bug-out. Fighting back is going to cause you a lot more harm than good, and the only instinces I would see it being justified would be if your family or yourself are going to be subjected to unwarranted risk to their lives. If your family member threw a glass bottle at a soldier and is getting apprehended, don’t fight it, your only going to make the situation worse. Don’t go gun-ho just because marshal law is enacted and start shooting people, your going to cause yourself an unnecessary death for no good reason.
And then they immediately retaliate with heavy fire and completely destroy you, but hey at least you got one or two of them right,
Your going to huh? Lmao well we aren’t towel heads and we will fight a thousand times harder than ISIS or any towel head jihad good luck with doing that like you said we will deal with you just the same and there’s lots more of us than there is towel heads so good luck to you$#%&!@*anybody that supports this crap
i have better equipment
AND the same/better training
not to mention degrees in law enforcement.crimininal justice and military
While that may be true, swearing to uphold the Constitution means helping the people maintain the Amendment rights… so confiscating firearms and the like seems unconstitutional in itself and should be orders the military and police forces object to carrying out. (I understand Martial Law means we don’t have these liberties as they’d once stood; but with soldiers going in and raiding from families I’d hope they’d think about their own families out there and how others are treating them while away.)
While that may be true, swearing to uphold the Constitution means helping the people maintain the Amendment rights… so confiscating firearms and the like seems unconstitutional in itself and should be orders the military and police forces object to carrying out. (I understand Martial Law means we don’t have these liberties as they’d once stood; but with soldiers going in and raiding from families I’d hope they’d think about their own families out there and how others are treating them while away.)
Lmfao
Donavan Shaffer you don’t have a fucking clue man, and I’m gonna leave it at that.
Carly Jarman We wouldn’t be raiding houses unless there was something deemed as contraband. We’re not going to take anything for military usage, the military would supply everything. The confiscating firearms part is a choosing the lesser of two evils deal. Instead of having to wonder about citizens shooting soldiers or each other and infringing on others constitutional rights to life and the pursuit of happiness, then yes if it was necessary firearms would be confiscated, because we could maintain peace and order instead of a community of angry citizens who interpret any crisis into an opportunity to do whatever they see cut and take the law into there own hands. It would be declared in a state of emergency where the local establishments could no longer control what’s going on, and the operations conducted would be to restore peace and to make a safer environment for the soldiers occupying the area and the LAW ABIDING citizens. It would really be nothing more than trying to stop a fire from spreading and minimizing any damages. If martial law occurred, as long as your following the temporary regulations you don’t have anything to worry about. It’s not open season for soldiers to harm civilians, it’s simply to restore order and keep everyone safe.
Trevor Kaiser I guess you slept through not following unlawful orders. Number one the US military can NOT be used against US citizens on US soil. If they are ordered to that is an unlawful order. Number two the moment you are ordered to violate any amendment on the Constitution that is an unlawful order. Number three no where in the Constitution does it allow martial law of any kind. The COC has no Constitutional authority to order martial law. There is NO justifiable reason for martial law to be declared period! The fact that you can speak as if it would be for our own good already shows you are willing to violate your oath. Also be warned that there are millions of Combat Veterans that remember their oath (against all enemies foreign and domestic) and will uphold it and know that any one that helps enforce martial law against the citizens of the United States has violated their oath and are now domestic enemies.Take it however you want. We are our troops biggest supporters but the moment you betray your oath and become an enemy combatant by violating your oath to the Constitution, we will have no mercy on you.Also remember more than half of you fellow troops believe as we do.
Insurrection act of 1807 says that that no one can use the specified branches of the military (which excludes; national guard and coast guard) against the American people unless circumstances authorized by the constitution OR CONGRESS arise. So it could happen. I’m not saying it will happen I’m clarifying what the mission would be if it were to happen. Your first point is wrong. Your second point is valid. There would be justifiable reason for martial law as a peacekeeping mission though.
Hypothetically lets say that you have an opportunity to take a mans right to bear arms away, and that you have the knowledge that if he maintains that right he will go on to kill innocent civilians or government employees, which in turn he would be taking away their rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. In taking away his right, no one dies, and your protecting the rights of good, innocent, law abiding citizens.
Either way someone is inadvertently losing their rights, but one way there is no loss of life?
What would you do?
Marc Walker also I have no issue with you sir and 90% of this is pure banter on an unlikely and hypothetical situation, so please take no offense.
Yes the insurrection act. Number one as stated before the Constitution does not authorize it so that leaves Congress and just as stated with the COC, congress does not have the authority to declare martial law. So that act is invalid and unconstitutional just like so many other laws and executive orders.What would I do? I would uphold my oath regardless of the consequences. I’m not going to argue with you over a hypothetical situation I’m not going to argue with you as I don’t have any issues with you either. I’ll leave this one last bit of info to think about, just in case God forbid this would ever arise. If you have never heard of it research it if you already know it try and remember it if the day ever comes and shtf here at home. “The Nuremberg defense.”
these cops must be south Korean, the all got the eyes
I’m with Marc Walker I’ll uphold my oath as well. The only difference I won’t be told by government that my rights are no longer valid because they decide it’s time for martial law.
If you are in the military when this happens I suggest you go UA. This is not a fight you want or have a chance to win. In truth if this order comes down the chain, your responsibility is to relieve your superiors of their command.
if marshal law happens most likely U.S. troops will be over seas and the UN troops will be the one to enforce it, and they have no problem shooting U.S. citizens. ……that is what Obama would do.