(Video) 10 of the Safest Places to Head to if WWIII Breaks Out

nuclear war

Sadly, given political, religious and social upheaval, worldwide, the world in 2017 is as close to a World Conflict as it was in July 1914; some, given the turmoil in the Middle East, would say we are even closer to the precipice than during that period.

There are at least six regions where a minor disagreement between nations could lead to armed combat between multiple, allied nations.

Because many of these regions have “strange bedfellows” allied, the likelihood of insulting on or another is magnified – You might be appeasing one nation while offending another!

So what if it happens? What do you do? Where do you go?

Is North America really as safe as we think or could it become a battleground, at least regionally?

To see a video on safe places you should at least consider before a World War erupts, check out the next page.

Next Page »


  1. Graham Wright said:

    It’s not the direct target of a nuke that has the radiation and fallout but everyone on the planet that shares the atmosphere and the winds . One of the new nukes will kill and cause cancers world wide .

  2. Scott Rickard said:

    I’ve thought about what to do in the event of a nuclear war and I think I’ve finally come to the conclusion that the best place to be might be right in the middle of a blast. Instantly vaporized and you wont have to worry about survival afterwords. No more war, no more radiation, no more starvation, no more disease, no survival problems, no more money, no more taxes, no nothing. At least not in this dimension. I dont know about the next place but I’m sure it will be an awfully big adventure.

  3. George Parsons said:

    steer clear from large cities and stay away from any military base. those are the first few targets. aint no rocket scientist but if i was russia thats were i would put them. inflict large casualties and cripple the military bases. japan did the same thing attacking pearl harbor

  4. Daniel Dudley said:

    No one stopped to think that armies with the firepower and intent to get to safety won’t take over places on this list after SHTF? Usually if there are limited resources the weaker population is going to be killed for safety and resources.

  5. Wayne Morrison said:

    I would drop one in Yellowstone, it would take less military power and take care of our allies in the northern hemisphere. Little nuke fallout to.