Just about every survivalist has a “bug-out” plan, a strategy for what to do when a survival crisis hits and it becomes necessary to move to a safer locale (or even to “bug-in”).
Less considered is where to go beyond “the camp” or some other predesignated safe space.
Is your bug-out location optimal for long-term survival? What obstacles and threats exist that would affect your quality of life? Where is the optimal place to go?
Those types of questions typically do not get asked, particularly if you already have a bug-out location in mind or in hand.
But knowing where to go in a survival situation or its aftermath is as important as knowing how to get there.
To find out one writer's opinion on where the optimal places to head in a survival situation are, check out the next page.
Next Page »
That’s your Governor fault! He must be for sanctuary cities!
I don’t know who decided these were the best places, but, they must be city slickers that don’t know nothing of survival!
Colorado all day, unlimited untapped resources all year round in the mountains
Yea go to Los Angles California that will be real safe. Hahahahahaha.
I hear you have alot of refugees there who side will they be on?
Sad.
I agree with staying in your own state, it’s familiar to you! Just do the best you can to get out of congested areas, try to have a plan to get to the country back roads!
I’m staying in mine.
dont worry, we have enough militia and CPL carriers to take care of the pieces of$#%&!@*that want to start anything..
“OR” you can stop electing these commie liberals to public office